Earlier tonight, i finished an encounter from an atheist, challenging me on one of my youtube vids. He began his attack on Christianity by pointing out how the resurrection of Christ is scientifically impossible. Now, rather then get into miracles, and so on, i immediately put him on the defense. I want him to justify his claims….watch what happens. This is a straight cut and paste. ”A” for atheist. “J” for jason:
A – people dead for 3 days cannot come back alive, its a fact, the body organs and functions fail, without life to sustain the organs and the other body parts, they become useless and damaged beyond use, some within hours
J – prove it.
A – wow way to thumbs down my comment
how about instead of my going through all of what ive already read in published papers and that, you go find it, im not here to find the info for u. u can do it, u have a computer, just google “what happens to the heart after death” or “how long does it take for organs to decompose after death” or something, idk u can find it with google, the evidence is there im not retracing my steps, i have more important things to do than find info that u will ignore
and i cant believe u thumbs downed a widely known fact. nice going
if anything think about it logically, why is the reason they ask for organ donation as soon as they can after someone dies? the organs dont last very long for u to wait around and make a decision, they start decomposing and become useless for those whose lives they could potentially save
J – Define logic.
I AM thinking logically. And logically, you can not take whatever examples you may have and NECESSARILY INFER A UNIVERSAL principle that would apply to all other examples. How do you know that all organs respond the same? You don’t.
Googling that isn’t going to prove anything, unless you can point me to an article that PROVES that ALL organs in ALL cases will do what you claim they would all do.
It’s called induction.
A – you are so stupid its unbelievable
J – ah, brilliant answer from a so-called “rational” person.
A – im not using it as my answer, i dont have time to go through this $%^#@# ur a human, u should have been educated enough to understand the fundamentals of our universe, but apparently not. i dont have time to try and explain this all to you, so this was not my response to your question, its simply me stating a wide spread opinion about u
J – if you don’t have time, then stop commenting. You seem to have enough time to type all this other baloney. You won’t answer because you can’t answer.
Google problem of induction, find the solution, then get back to me.
A – i dont have the patience explaining simple concepts to you that u should already know
bottom line is if u think that a person can be dead for 3 days and then come back to life with all their organs working, you are delusional
“googling doesnt prove anything”
i’ll still google your problem
J – that’s not an answer.
Look up ad hom while you’re at it.
A – again thats not my answer to your question
its a statement that any logical person can denounce
what u fail to realize is that regardless of what we feel about the laws that govern our universe, or how we choose to interpret them or even explain them, they cannot be changed by us. its what governs our universe, and they do not abide be us, we abide by them. when u die, u will decompose. we base our judgements on what our reality gives us
so i looked up the problem of induction, and i find it to be weak. its basically asking us to ignore all information we know on the grounds of “what if”
if you go around using the problem of induction as a means of philosophical view, essentially u cannot learn anything because u will always be in doubt of whether it is always true. granted we cannot know anything for sure INCLUDING THE EXISTENCE OF A GOD
but thats why we make our conclusions based on what we are presented with our reality
J – “granted we cannot know anything for sure ” like saying that people can’t be revived after three days.
lol. This is what i love about atheists. All you have to do is keep them talking.
A – i dont have anymore time for this, u fail to understand what im trying to say, and since u have the preconception of “we cant know anything” u will not understand the fundamental laws that govern our universe.
i am done with this now
peace
=====================
See what happened? Atheists love to assert universals. It is impossible to get through life without them. Don’t let them. Make them rationally justify their assertions. Once you do, you can typically get them to say that we can’t know anything with 100% certainty, which will immediately contradict the universal assertion they made to begin with.
Here, he started off saying that it is impossible for someone to be revived after three days. Once i pressed him to acknowledge what his empiricism really leads to (skepticism) and he admitted that we can’t know anything with certainty, it then follows that he can’t know for certain that dead people can’t resurrect.
This is where empiricism/atheism leads. Self contradiction. I can give you example after example of this. You can reduce EVERY apologetic encounter with an atheist in this manner. There is a reason why God says that atheism is “foolish”.
Now, had the atheist conceded his contradiction, i would have then gone on to explain how Christianity does not suffer the problem of induction because it does not utilize empiricism. But, the atheist cut me off before we could get that far.
