Dave Green recently wrote a brilliant, albeit brief, critique of a few remarks by Todd Dennis that I thought needed to be published. The critique is from PretCosmos@yahoogroups.com, Dave’s wonderful group (proud to be a friend of yours, brother). The article in question the quotes from Dennis come from http://www.preteristblog.com/ ?p=4126. The following is from Green, entirely (with permission):
Todd Dennis wrote: “The dead weight of systematic full preterism is seriously hurting the greater acceptance of [partial] preterist theology in the Christian world.”
My response: The reality, of course, is that the dead weight of partial (inconsistent) preterism is seriously helping the greater acceptance of preterism in the Christian world. :)
Todd Dennis wrote: “However, the heavy isolationism built into group terminology only ensures that the pond of full preterism will continue to recede from the ocean of Christianity on earth.”
My response: You know you’re winning when your enemies accuse you of two opposite things at the same time. On the one hand, we’re continually trying to “legitimize” and “mainstream” ourselves in the Christian world by using “orthodox” terminology (calling ourselves “preterists” ). Then on the other hand, there’s a heavy isolationism built into our terminology and we’re continually receding from Christianity. :^O
Todd Dennis wrote: ” . . . [T]he [partial] preterist movement . . . has been humming along quite well for over 2,000 years. . . . ”
The reality, of course, is that not even Christianity itself has been around yet “for over 2,000 years.” :) Furthermore, partial preterism as a “movement” isn’t all that much older than the full preterist movement. This is because the former gave birth to, and sustains, and energizes, the latter.



