A public forum to discuss 1 Corinthians 15 with full preterist Michael Miano.
Whoa, man, Sam, you make me want to jump out of my chair and run around. This was awesome. Seriously brother, thanks. How beautiful is our redemption!
You wrote, ” I mean, if Full Preterism is so obvious, so […]
Basically, I’ll just take Miano’s last post and break it down, showing that he does not interact at all with what we have presented, and that he does not interact with the text. Clearly, there is a “cram it […]
Mike, I need to reserve some time to comment on this, but just glossing over it, I note many grammatical-textual mistakes (like trying to make a point that “body” is singular – which in Greek is POINTless). I […]
“But someone may ask, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body do they come?” (v.35)
Let us consider the context thus far. We have people in the church at Corinth who are saying there is no […]
Hi Mike,
You wrote, “Now Greg, I believe we agree that the tomb was empty and that Christ was resurrected, but I think your really trying to push that issue here. What is simply being told in 1 Corinthians […]
Mike,
You write,
“PaulT, obviously verse 12 doesn’t speak of a a physical resurrection all that clearly, or we wouldn’t be having this discussion.”
Please don’t take offense to this, but that you miss […]
PaulT, obviously verse 12 doesn’t speak of a a physical resurrection all that clearly, or we wouldn’t be having this discussion. What verse 12 says, as your wrote is, “how can some of you say there is no […]
Mike i don’t understand what is so hard for you to understand concerning 1 cor 15. There is not difficulty unless you’re trying to interject some foreign (ET) concept in to the text. it is clear from the context […]
Michael, you wrote, “One can easily notice that you are choosing not to deal with verses 16-18. “For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been raised, YOUR […]
This is how it works. Ignore the obvious implications of resurrection and head straight for the “time texts”. Having ostensibly secured the meaning of the time texts, then go back to 1 Cor. 15 and REDEFINE […]
Mike, this statement is VERY TELLING of your position, “For the record, I believe beyond any doubt that Christ was ressurected bodily (whether it was the same body, a spiritual glorified body, whatever..) but […]
Mike,
Were you going to provide any exegesis of 1 Cor. 15:24-34?
Mike,
You ask, “can you explain where I have read something into the text that wasn’t there?” It really isn’t that difficult, you wrote, “At this point to the common eye, it appears that Paul is being […]
“Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority, and power” (1 Corinthians 15:24).
Ok, so the last couple posts we have been venturing […]
I’m not really a big fan of coat tails so please Paul T, can you explain where I have read something into the text that wasn’t there? Let’s not swing on Sam’s coat tail. As far Robert Thaggard, they let the […]
Nail on the head Sam Frost!
Sam,
Great point. Mr. Miano has re-framed what Paul wrote. That isn’t exegesis, nor is it intellectually honest to read into the text something not there.
God Bless,
To all that are posting: Just because we opened the Second Installment does not mean material from the First is now complete. You can continue to bring those points up from 1-11. I just want to be able to […]
Now in context we have Paul writing to the Corinthian church concerning the divisions amongst them, the Gentile-Jew divide that is occuring do to freedoms from the Law, and now we have Paul reminding the […]
Sam, I don’t want to violate your wish to close down this section, if you want to move this response somewhere else, please, by all means do it. However, I do think I need to address some of Mike’s assertions. […]
