Everyone,

All great points. What gets me is that full preterism seems to think that they have the realized prophetic revelation that has been clouded for centuries…now I thought prophecy and revealtion […]

Greg,

That’s my job!! :)

John,

You also can contact me @ kengalloway@comcast.net
I was once a full preterist as well. As Sam said, disregard any hate mail you get from others about the Jason and him. It is complete, arbitrary […]

Sam,

Yes. I used the same argument until I was presented with the fact that the reason Paul uses this metaphorically, is to accentuate the certainty that the dead will rise, and that if “Christ hasn’t been […]

Rich,

As I keep saying to every full pret I come in contact with, I will say to you as well. There is no such term called covenant “sin” death as the death of Adam, having existed anywhere in human recorded […]

Davo,

About the 24 hr days, the Hebrews thought so for thousands of years. Why should we, interpret them any different? I understand, in light of “science’ and “evidence”, it is difficult to reconcile it, […]

Davo,

As far as I understand the FP camp is there are mainly 2 views. CBV and IBD (two of which I chewed on greatly in prayer, and in study, always open to God’s change of mind >> for me). IBD at least […]

Davo,

I hardly see it as juvenile, since the church agrees with me, unless you are willing to say the church is juvenile as well 8-) Given certain contexts, as I stated already, “Language, in all cultures, […]

When Paul walked into the synagogue in Romans 6, and said, “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God [is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." I am 100% sure they weren't saying, "for the wages of […]

Hi Dave,

I understand being saved from toxic living, however, I don’t see this as Biblical. Sure, there are many things the gospel saves us from that isn’t mentioned in the Bible, like my once drug addictions, […]

Green, Hassert, nor anyone else can answer…what are they saved from?

Great article Sam.

I see the same thing happening as well Sam, but in light of this, what they have, as we have said so many times before to those who strongly oppose the historic church, is that their fundamental system is not […]

Mike,

Col 3:4 is 70 CE for you, which as I said, defines your interpretation of the glorified body of Christ. We place this in the future, when He comes to judge the dead. This then denies the current body of […]

Mike,

Catechism: Profession of the Christian faith, article 1:

“By the phrase”He descended into hell”, the Apostles’ Creed confesses that Jesus did really die and through his death for us conquered death and […]

Michael,

I think you are missing something here. As Sam stated already, what he believes Christ’s body is, is his presupposition. It is the one that rose from the tomb, it is the one everybody touched, and it […]

Michael,

Last I checked, pelgian hysperpreterism is considered whacky. But that’s right. http://www.ccel.org is thousands of miles away from you and you are unable to sit down in one of their independent, internet […]

“They were being TRANSFORMED into the SAME IMAGE from GLORY (Old Covenant) to GLORY (New Covenant). If they are in the New Covenant then they have been TRANSFORMED into the Lord’s IMAGE.”

This is completely […]

Paul,

I believe Doug W. presupposes a 70 CE resurrection of the dead. Any preterist that does this goes against the very core of Paul and Jesus’ Pharisaical teaching on the resurrection of the dead. It is […]

The system denies it. Just because they say they don’t is irrelevant. They just aren’t being consistent with their system.

Amen Sam. In time, as the church continues its growth, eventually, we will all see eye to eye.
Maturity is evident. Full preterism is afraid of what is occurring in evangelical circles, layman and scholar […]