pault
John,
Thank you for your comment and as Sam states your honesty is much appreciated.
“Your points are well taken. I am certainly familiar with both your line of reasoning and the epistemological […]
John,
Thank you for your comment and as Sam states your honesty is much appreciated.
“Your points are well taken. I am certainly familiar with both your line of reasoning and the epistemological […]
Sam, Jason,
You would think a guy who wrote, “The thousands of different denominations and their variety of church polity illustrates the ecclesiological “mess” that is historic Christianity.”, wouldn’t be so […]
Folks,
Catching up on some weekend reading I see where Mr. Green failed to comprehend the argument offered in response to Dr. Birks fallacious charge. I’m not surprised after all, not only does Mr. Green fail […]
Folks,
Dr. Kelly Birks has responded to this blog writing,
“ I read your ridiculous and inaccurate appraisal of my FB comments in your article on ROC. Once again, (and i knew that you would probably do […]
Sam,
I appreciate Mr. Lewis honesty. Is Mr. Lewis definition of “historical-critical” defined by a view which claims “reality is uniform and universal and that one’s present experience supplies an objective […]
Jon,
You are in good hands here. Sam and Jason have done a great job providing sound reasoned argument against the hyperpreterist position. Another source you may want to consider is Dee Dee Warren’s site, […]
Greg,
I see the blatherskite Mr. Green explained,
“Nothing Mr. Green wrote implies that “God decreed a curse from which He never offers redemption.”
Good, then given Mr. Green explained, “We must all […]
Sam,
Help me out. Mr. Green writes,
“We must all agree that physical death was at least involved in the curse.”
Is Mr. Green claiming God decreed a curse from which He never offers redemption?
Oh, […]
Folks, evidently the poster doesn’t have an answer for Augustine’s argument. However, this is interesting. The poster writes,
“I’d think the then imposition of sheol/hades came to be a problem BECAUSE OF the […]
Folks,
The poster writes, “I therefore am already sinless living in a world where sin does not exist.” Perhaps he is using a redacted version of the inspired text. A version which doesn’t contain, “If we say […]
Sam,
Here is how Augustine put it,
Chapter 2 [II.]—If Adam Had Not Sinned, He Would Never Have Died.
“They who say that Adam was so formed that he would even without any demerit of sin have died, not as […]
Or how about a third option? Have you read Augustine on the conditional nature of Adam?
Amen…I hope it is the result of the Holy Spirit at work.
Pointing out the logical inconsistency in the “objection” offered is tantamount to “vociferously pad[ding] …posts with fluffy comments”. All the while the poster never deals with the simple fact his “objection” […]
Sam,
Clearly the hyperpreterist has difficulty distinguishing the concept being argued. The poster writes,
“Well why not Sam? How then or by what means are you determining what “glorified” means in relation […]
Is “what about this” the best you have? Evidently 2 Cor. 5:8 has been redacted from your Bible. Nevertheless, didn’t you know, to “be away from the body” is to be “at home with the Lord.” Oh, and one other […]
Davo,
Your argument was already addressed here, http://thereignofchrist.com/hyper-preterist-dont-come-forth-by-paul-gates/ Your response was truly deafening.
Folks,
This is interesting. Mr. Wilkerson claims, “My point was that the Bible is much more clear on the chronology of the resurrection than the substance of it (if this weren’t so, there wouldn’t be so much […]
Sam,
I noticed one of the less than thoughtful hyperpreterist claimed, “No full preterist denies God’s ability to extend grace.” Gee, then you have to wonder why the hyperpreterist also claimed, “According to […]