Reformed classical Arminianism (not semi-Pelagianism, nor the form of Arminianism that followed the Remonstrants) is also antithetical to FP. In that systematic theology, since God knows “all” that will accept […]
Saweet. {copy / paste} Totally plagiarizing this. LOL
Jason, nice.
Over on DID, where Jeff roams, I had a conversation about Genesis 1 “trees.” I said that besides the clear meaning of Genesis 1 being about the physical creation, I needed it to be about the […]
Jon, I sent you an e-mail with some books, articles, and stuff in it. Hope it helps.
Wow. If physical death is not part of the punishment for sin, then why did Jesus physically die? And why did God punish all but Noah’s family with physical death in the flood? And why did God threaten Abimelech […]
It really shouldn’t be that big of a struggle. It is what is revealed. The “problem” folks seem to have with this is they think “science” is revealing otherwise. But if you are a Christian and you already believe […]
The fact that Jesus will heal THIS physical body, points to the fact that He will fully redeem THIS physical body in resurrection. That’s an amazing connection. Wow. I’m amazed at the tightness of the Adam-Jesus […]
Wow, thus the primary Biblical definition of death is actually physical and not spiritual?! If so, this explains a whole heck of a lot. Remarkable. I see sickness as incipient death and treat it as such; an enemy […]
And to think as FP does, this death is labeled, “natural”! I’m so ashamed I thought that way for so long.
Excellent points and well-written, Sam. I expect this to be in your new book, and, of course, further […]
Doug wrote, “My point was that the Bible is much more clear on the chronology of the resurrection than the substance of it (if this weren’t so, there wouldn’t be so much argument on the topic).”
I find this is […]
Yup… I think we are in heated agreement. God IS love even WITHOUT us. Amen! :)
Yes. Amen. But now we do love God because of the love He shed in our hearts by His Spirit. I love this! Check this long quote out. It is taken from “Classic Christianity – A Systematic Theology, Volume I” by […]
And, btw, it was well worth the time. Good stuff.
Aw, c’mon, Sam, love needs a beloved, doesn’t it? How would God express His holy agape and holy eros without an object for both? :)
Sam, Dan Delegrave (major email spammer) told me I was a member of some “mystery religion” because I wouldn’t believe his take on resurrection in AD70. He also refuses to answer Philippians 3:21. Ironically he […]
“It is painfully obvious that you have NEVER had a good grasp on orthodoxy to begin with, as is the case with all hyperprets…current and former.
I’m guilt as charged. When I started studying the historic […]
Paul, Dan Delegrave just ask similar questions to me. He wrote:
“”Since your view of the nature of the resurrection involves a reassimilation of flesh atoms (that are then zapped into immortality), the question […]
John, I was an FP since 1995. I am reformed classical Arminian (i.e. not a Calvinist like Sam, Jason & Dr. Talbot). Last year when I started reading about Sam’s exodus from FP, I saw his arguments on infinity and […]
Larry, you have confirmed what I just argued. The fact that you DO BELIEVE THIS mitigates AGAINST full preterism. You are saying, by quoting these passages, that Jesus is still mediating for mankind (us creeps, […]
This is interesting. Larry, where is Jesus now? If you say He is at the right hand of God, then what is He doing there? If He is still interceding for mankind, then He is not done with His job yet and has […]
